Showing posts with label piggies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label piggies. Show all posts

Monday, November 22, 2010

Arrogance: Climate Science vs Biblical Belief (Rep Shimkus)





Arrogance: having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities (Dictionary Version 2.1.3 (80.4)) 

The only arrogance I can see is with Rep. Jim Shimkus (Dumb). Surely, faith, when it obfuscates and denies truth it must be the epitome of arrogance. When faith is a champion of ignorance it should be clear that truth is the competition. Gaining control of the House Energy and Commerce Committee would be a major coup for deniers and carpetbaggers.

Who does Shimkus think he is to claim that his particular Christian faith is infallible. Let his Bible stand up to scrutiny, to irrefutable evidence. The proof is in belief and that is the problem. Truth that relies on faith is bound to be politically motivated. I'm not sure I trust one faith over another, and I think the best thing is to keep faiths out of the political process as much as possible.

Am I alone in thinking this guy is mad? His gall and contempt for humanity I can not fathom. What he stands for is dangerous and immoral. To do nothing is to assure that millions of people will die and millions more suffer.

I think the goal with global warming is to minimise as much as possible humanities contributions to warming, and to prepare ourselves for inevitable change. Let's be clear - Shimkus's God is the US greenback. And that's the only green he defends is the kind that handsomely lines his and his friends's pockets.

Also not appearing to be interested in truth, the other candidate for the Energy and Commerce Committee job, Rep. Barton (Dumber), is another who treats us like fools. On behalf of sanity I do apologise for this man.

Close your eyes and slowly count to ten. Maybe it will all go away.

TPM: http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/11/new_house_climate_czar.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Talking-Points-Memo+%28Talking+Points+Memo%3A+by+Joshua+Micah+Marshall%29

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Things I just don't get


Storm Runoff Pollutes Los Angeles Area California Beaches


Just when you think Obama does 'the principled' thing...

Tell me, what possible justification makes endangering our environment the right course of action when the responsible way forward is bleeding obvious? We must turn away from the independence of fossil fuels as quickly as possible before it is too late. Of course I know our world runs on it. But I just have to believe we can find a suitable solution that doesn't rely on putting crucial ecosystems at risk. There has to be respect, a way to live more harmoniously with our environment and each other.

Considering the repercussions that could eventuate from a significant environmental disaster, planning to drill off the US coast is a desperate act. All the money or power in the world isn't worth jeopardising our planet for. Last time I checked there was nowhere else to migrate to. Mission to Mars is still a fantasy. There are no other options. We either ruin where we live and destroy our future or change in order to survive. To me it is that simple. Terminate the source of what gives us life and the writing is clear; it's Jonestown and kool-aid again, only on a global scale.

I just can't get why so few people understand this.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-drilling31-2010mar31,0,4617559.story

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Lutz Retires from GM

Mr Lutz, Mr Lutz let bygones be bygones, eh? Do us a favour, please. In the interim between your next reincarnation and this fasten some metachlorian scruples and re-energise to the light side. Go with the force, Lutz Sciencebalker.



Tuesday, February 23, 2010

This is how religion does it

There is probably no state in the United States of America more Republican conservative than the Beehive state of Utah. The hive buzzes under the paternal eye of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints or the Mormons as they are more familiarly known as. According to a 2008 Pew report, just under 50% of its citizens go that way. The next closest religious affiliation belongs to the Catholics at 10%. Sixteen percent declare no affiliation.

Needless to say, the voice of the church is zealously endorsed by its majority practitioners and thus the politicians often vote in line with predominant Mormon beliefs. Political outcomes are popularly determined according to religious views expounded by the Mormon hierarchy. In this it would appear that the separation of church from state is a thinly veiled disguise. Undoubtedly the church leaders protect their vested interests through their suppliant disciples. In influencing the minds and hearts of sufficient numbers of Utahn's the church is able to maintain its control of state affairs, and extend this leverage federally. Orin Hatch and Harry Reid are two Mormon senators who have high political profiles. More substantially the church membership prodigiously stretches across all the states, and Mormons are motivated voters. In fairness the church like many religious organisations seeks to shape wider community/political outcomes according to their tenets.

For example, Mormon church leaders played a significant role in enabling California's Proposition 8 legislature to restrict the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples only. The threat of gay marriages being legalised in California was abhorrent to them and had to be stopped. They coordinated huge financial support to help garner the proposition by a narrow majority 52.24%.

Finally, we come to the issue of environment and the opposition to global warming. How does Utah vote on this issue? By now it should be obvious. It votes according to what they hear from the pulpit.

I happen to know a number of devout Mormons and pretty well all of them express the same mantra as does the Mormon entertainer Glenn Beck. They do not believe global warming is man-made. In fact to them it is a mighty international conspiracy or hoax. They know all this you see because god speaks directly to them. From this superior vantage point the end of days is nigh, Jesus in his wrath will return and eventually burn the earth, cleansing it of iniquity by napalm and then restart the earth all over again in a pure celestial form. Global warming runs according to prophecy along with the unleashing of Satan and his apocalyptic horsemen who are apparently whipping the earth into a maelstrom. In this scenario, in the grand scheme of things, global warming makes small potatoes.

Personally, I just don't get it why they resist pitching in to help save the saveable planet. The solutions are manageable. If we could just work collectively then we are in with a chance to minimalise the damage. Instead these 'saviours of men' prefer to plunk their heads in the sand and trust in their vengeful god. As our flesh burns we might want to reflect on our mistake not to join them in salvation. They, in their insurance fire-proof garments, will be profoundly sorry we did not repent of our sins. But their tears will soon dry when our crispy skinned resurrected bodies are presented into a terrestrial or telestial world that is supposedly so wonderful we would all kill ourselves just to get there. Joe Smith's earth is not for the scorched billions. It belongs to god's few anti-social fanatics.

Hard to argue against this divine logic, I know.

Anyway, here is the result of where Utahn's stand on global warming. It rankles me to think the interests of people most likely to be disadvantaged by rising sea levels are not taken into account. Where do the Samaritan's keepers get off turning their backs on humanity. Utah's action to do nothing exposes more than just immorality. What a dull thinking lot these goody goodies are.

By gum it stinks in Salt Lake City.


Gay Activists Gather At Mormon Temple For "Kiss In"



Thursday, January 21, 2010

It's the Solar Flares, Stupid

Lutz be careful not to say anything stupid.

According to the man himself cars do not contribute to CO2 global warming as much as solar flares do. Yes, the majority of respected scientists have made a serious error in attributing the scale of human activities to global warming.

Press Preview For Detroit International Auto Show

Amazingly, Lutz, GM's CEO, knows a thing or two about how to interpret scientific data, Thanks to his superior knowledge about how the earth works we can drive our cars with utter contempt for the 'crock of shit' 'ers who have taken us down the proverbial garden path.

Well done, Lutz. I feel a whole lot better now knowing the sun is the culprit. Someone call up Bruce Willis. It's time we nuked the sun and stopped this charade. Long live the SUV!

I wonder why.
Bruce Newton: "I am not going to give a speech on this because everytime I do I get in trouble," Lutz said, then immediately began explaining his views."

Bob Lutz takes the first foilist award for 2010. Congrats!


Monday, December 21, 2009

Hindsight Wisdom from Frank Rich (NYT)

When will we ever learn that greed is the killer.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/opinion/20rich.html?emc=eta1
Frank Rich: "only a few years after Enron's very public and extensively dissected crimes, the same bankers, federal regulatory agencies and securities-rating companies were giving toxic "assets" a pass. We were only too eager to go along for the lucrative ride until it crashed"

Time Warner Political Conference 2008 - Day 1
Frank Rich 2008

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

More grind directed at the Wank Bank

A fine summation from Ross Gittens.
Ross Gittens: "They were doing fine - even before they put through their extra rate rises. They did it not to keep their profitability, but to fatten it."

Mark my words the share price for Westpac will go up!

Banks still could be part of the solution. However, I'm not holding my breath.

Now where am I going with this?

I've reached the point there is nothing more to gain by whinging about Westpac's pleonexia. In a few days, as they know, they will be off the front page. The public and media will tire of vitriolic condemnations and return to their well worn head-holes in the sand. See no evil, hear no evil, basic apathy one can wager on. I'm confident the revolution is not going to happen this year 09. Be assured that nothing will change soon, certainly not from the governments perspective, at any rate.

Now that I have gotten banks off my chest it is time to go where I should have gone to from the beginning. I firmly believe the most important challenge we will face in our lifetime concerns the environment and our duty to stop our wasteful consumption and save the earth from ruination. So from this point forward I will concentrate on the Copenhagen talks and the global discourse on environment.

P.S. Don't worry banks will still be on the radar screen.

Banana Smoothies and Banana Bank Westpac

A beautiful bunch a' ripe banana
Daylight come and me wan' go home
Hide the deadly black tarantula
Daylight come and me wan' go home

- stanza from The Banana Boat Song, (Day-O)

Imagine, Harry Belafonte crooning this song with a blender grinding loudly in the background. At one point you are going to scream, "Stop, this racket is driving me crazy!"

One can only marvel at Westpac's latest unusual approach to serving the customer. With all due respect the jig is up, the daylight came and went days ago, and its now time to troddle home before that lurking tarantula turns into Sideshow Bob doing banana splits.

Unfortunately, I can't post the banana smoothie clip Westpac sent its customers. Hopefully you can still find it on this link.


Confused? I should get to the point.

Basically, Westpac sent an email with a clip/cartoon to their customers. It should have been titled Mortgages for Dummies.

The cartoon condescendingly explains how raising mortgage interest rates are like making smoothies from banana crops that have suffered damage from a severe storm. More expensive bananas translates into more expensive costs (ie. money), and since banks make money from virtually thin air (from other banks that borrow from other banks that keep a similar piddle of hard currency in their vaults) they are vulnerable to money that costs more to borrow. The dark clouds of competition frighten them that they will become bankrupt, but worse they feel for their customers who would suffer even greater harm should the banks be unable to turn over aberrant profit$. In other words without a tight-ass bank the dream of owning property is at risk.

Doesn't raising the interest rate, in fact, make it more difficult for clients to live day-0 and keep making their mortgage payments. How are average folk going to get a pay increase when banks are withholding credit to businesses, for example? Do workers overcome this by taking on additional stress, toiling longer hours or working more jobs? In the end people risk losing more than petty assets. What about health and happiness? Are these not important values? Frankly, is anything worth being a slave for? Is it just me, isn't there something perverse in their logic? Let's be honest, are there no other options? C'mon.

They are really something this bank. The more they try to justify their decision to gouge the customer the worse they appear. This business is now in the realm of silliness. The Sydney Morning Herald is like a pitbull on Westpac. I can't wait for tomorrow's news headline.

Be scared of the deadly black tarantula. It makes a mean banana smoothie.


Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Angst to Action

When banks turns the screws tighter the expected response from the serfs is to take it stoically by stuffing a rag in the mouth and biting down hard. There is little recourse but to submit to the inflicted pain. Extrication is not one of the options. When you're screwed you're really screwed.

In following the Westpac saga it is with some incredulity we find angst moving toward action, albeit more a ripple than a wave. Nonetheless we shall admire it for what it is worth.


At Westpac sustainability means 'doing the right thing'. It's our short-hand for what is complex, values-based agenda focused on doing the right thing for our customers, our employees, our shareholders, our communities and our business.

The Westpac bank utilises community dialogue to determine how they deal with 'material issues,' for their stakeholders (shareholders). I am not sure what 'material issues' mean. It is code for something.

A number of agencies make up Westpac's Community Consultative Council. This council provides community feedback so that Westpac can determine its priorities for its stakeholders. The Council is an integral element of their Stakeholder Engagement Framework.

In response to the latest furor over doubling the interest rates Sydney Morning Herald reported that the Finance Sector Union and Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) resigned from Westpac's Community Consultative Council. I checked Westpac's list and did not see these agencies posted there. I presume they have already been removed from the web page.

Further, Graeme Samuel, the head for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, announced that he is considering withdrawing support for Westpac's takeover of St. George Bank.

The sabers clash. Who's to say if any serious action will come from this. What is significant though is that community outrage is being taken one step further than being simply expressed .

"Westpac is disappointed," said a spokesman, David Lording. "But we respect that sometimes opinions diverge."

So how does Westpac Respond?

Spin, baby spin. Its all the global financial crisis's fault! Wow! how convenient. It's the universal answer guaranteed to be indefensible. It works too. How many times have I heard Wayne Swan use it? As a defence it has lost credibility.

"Westpac tries a new twist on rate rise"
Adele Fergusen: Are we living in a parallel universe?

Also, check out the comments section. There are plenty of satisfied bank sympathisers registering their support for Westpac. So what's the problem with the rest of us?

Gail Kelly, Managing Director and CEO of Westpac Banking Corporation, speaks in Washington

Gail Kelly, CEO of Westpac

Friday, December 4, 2009

This little piggy wants more... More!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/dec/03/bankers-executive-pay-bonuses-criticised
"As tensions escalated between the banks and Whitehall, ministers condemned the industry for paying huge bonuses at a time when the economy was still in recession and the taxpayer had committed more than £100bn to prevent banks from collapsing."

It's a bit hypocritical coming from those ministers who recently were humiliated over their own peccadilloes, but nonetheless reassuring to have on side, today, in these trying times.

But what about tomorrow? Ah, that's the £100bn question...


Fun and Games

Something happened this week which doesn't happen very often. And no, it wasn't the news about another celebrity sportsman falling from grace. It was something else even more amazing.

A few days ago I mentioned that Westpac had raised its standard variable rate double the cash interest rate the RBA had passed on to them. It seems the other banks were more cautious about following Westpac's lead so soon after. They decided to wait and see how Westpac would fare from the backlash, which was sure to emanate via the media and those most unfortunate patrons who still have business with them. Of course the question begs, why did the other banks hold off? And as it looks today, why did they decide not to follow suit?

We have all seen that gesture when someone winks and taps their nose with their finger to denote they are withholding information. Well actually, everyone knows that collusion is happening, but nobody talks about it, unless they are recklessly fearless or an impotent small fry not worth dusting off. It's an unspoken rule we all get, don't we? What Elephant?

Picking a fight with oil companies over outrageous, unqualified holiday petrol price increases, for example, is a futile exercise. When one jumps they all jump. They have perfected the art of disguising collusive behaviour.

Anyway, we all expect if one major bank makes a move then the others will follow. Not to be too conspicuous banks take turns being the leader. They think we do not know (nudge, nudge, wink). The way they normally work is through some tacit agreement (stringently denied by the banks of course) that involves one bank sticking its neck out and advancing something sure to ire people and businesses.

What was unusual this time around was the National Australia Bank (NAB) actually bucked this time honoured trend. How Westpac feels about this traitorous act is probably the reason they are pretty much silent. It will be interesting to see how things pan out.

Whether we believe it or not banks are sensitive to public scrutiny. Shamed and pressed, they can accommodate change. They do manage to recoup their losses in other ways, however, so don't fret too much for them. They are resilient in this regard. You can bet your mother's life that they will never put people over profits.


http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/westpac-executives-are-jumpy-20091202-k6fo.html
Peter Martin: "It's called, "the mating call of banks.""

Julian Lee: "Whatever you may think about Westpac's decision to jump ahead of the market, it is guilty of displaying a breathtaking lack of nous when it comes to marketing."

You think?


Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Double the pleasure

Westpac Announces Merger Discussions With St George

As I was saying earlier about the greed of banks we have this Christmas tiding to uplift us. I am referring to Westpac Bank NSW. Within hours of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) raising the official cash rate by 25 points Westpac announced an increase of their standard variable mortgage rate by 50 points. Not bad profit if one can get it. Not very ethical, but there you go.

Of course the bank profusely defended this action, citing continuing cost pressures from wholesale funding markets and the RBA's increase in the cash rate. Naturally, the bank feels regret that they have to take this action. I watched their television spokesman, Bill Evans, this morning fuddle his way through trying to justify the increase. On the ABC radio report the Westpac spokesperson read a statement basically saying that he could not comment on the bank's decision. Duh!

Well there are a number of not happy Jans and Jeffs running around town today crying foul. Of course, the Treasurer, Wayne Swan, can't see the justification for Westpac's reaction. The main banks have made outstanding profits during this supposed economic crisis. The banks received government support in the form of the bank deposit guarantee. Do you think the banks would see it to support the people in these difficult circumstances? Nnnnnope!

I think our government is so beholden to the banks they haven't the nerve to regulate them. We're cooked.

If the shoe fits...
Westpac's chief executive Gail Kelly: "This is bank bashing, isn't it?"

We're in the money, we're in the money, da da da



We're following the leader, the leader, ... where ever it may go, dadum, dadum




Saturday, November 28, 2009

The World Wide Story of our age - Bankers Win

The Times Online headline reads "Britain's bankers win double victory on bonuses and charges"

While this news is local to the U.K. this phenomena is veritably international in scope. Where I hail from, Australia, banks are effectively an unelected, unaccountable branch of government. Our feckless elected leaders, as we all are in substantial debt to these lending institutions, are at the mercy of the federal reserve and four major banks. Even better than interest debt they especially like how fees earn tonnes of money for them and they almost always get what they want when they want it. After all the laws were made for these guys. Some really reckless banks could crash but as we have learnt taxpayers can be forced to pick up the tab and then $ome when these captains of capitalism make, how does one say it delicately, errors of judgement. We bow to Wall Street - lest we offend them! Don't take my house away!



Britain's bankers received a double boost yesterday as they celebrated a landmark victory over unauthorised overdraft fees and saw off the threat of a crackdown on pay. (more...)

National interest and policy making vs. the banking sector

The idea that banks can be regulated is ludicrous. Does anyone seriously believe our politicians and governments will stand up to them? If there is any doubt about this think how much our Australian government, for example, bends knee to the fossil energy lobbyists. We are in so much debt to banks that it scares me, and to be honest we do not have a strong track record when it comes to making bold decisions for the long term. Let's face it. We really don't like change at all, and that's because on the whole we tend to be a reluctant, apathetic and procrastinatory lot. Change will come whether we like it or not. I'd like to think we could be smart and make the hard choices that inevitably have to be made, preferably sooner than later.

Professor Ross Garnaut: "I think that Obama and the people closest to him know that that the influence has to be unwound, but Wall Street is taking nothing for granted, it's vesting more heavily in the political process now than ever before, and so you'd be an optimist to think that first best regulatory arrangements will be introduced."


Monday, November 23, 2009

Sen. Al Franken's Remarks on Health Care Reform - Part 2

Sen. Al Franken's Remarks on Health Care Reform - Part 1


If you want to get a handle on U.S. health care listen to this speech from the new senator from Minnesota.

Al Franken: "from 2000 to 2007... insurance premiums doubled... 6 million more uninsured... insurance companies profit rose 428%... that's all you need to know, that's all you need to know why we have to pass this bill"

Isn't it obvious why insurance companies are lobbying hard to destroy health reform legislation? I admire this guy. He has fortitude.


Thursday, November 19, 2009

This little piggy gets roast beef

In these tough economic times U.S. Health Insurance Companies justify a 9% rise in prices for no-name pharmaceutical medicines. Despite their denials it seems they want to send a strong message to Health Reformists who are proposing at least some semblance of coverage for millions of its people. As we know about 30+ million of the poorest U.S. citizens do not have access to quality affordable health care. It certainly makes one wonder about the priorities corporations and some politicians hold when they appear to defend a view that health care should not be extended to those trapped in poverty. The thing that bothers me is the indifferent attitude these pharmaceuticals have taken to those who are struggling financially. They seem to be more concerned about their bottom line than the health of those who need help most.

Ron Rogers: “Price adjustments for our products have no connection to health care reform,” said Ron Rogers, a spokesman for Merck, which raised its prices about 8.9 percent in the last year, according to a stock analyst’s report.... (more)

Piggies

Everywhere there's lots of piggies
Living piggy lives
- lyrics taken from "The Beatles" song, Piggies

It is a sad indictment of human beings, generally speaking, that pigs suffer the reputation of being referred to as a greedy species. From what I have read they are remarkably social and smart animals far undeserving of the acrimony we sometimes impute to them. The humble pig trumps just about any other animal I know when it comes to getting bad press. For example, drippings of gluttony comes to my mind when I hear the word, "swine," and depending on the context, being called a "pig" is similarly unctuous. In my opinion calling even a corrupt police officer a pig is crass and wrong. Indeed, it is most unfavourable to be accused of living in a pigsty rather than a sharksty, spidersty, or snakesty. However one refers to human beings pinning them to a pig is not kosher.

[Forgive me for a tangent] Funnily enough though, this takes me back to a Goodies sketch called Lips, Or Almighty Cod where Tim Brooke-Taylor tried to rile a fish by word-baiting it, "You stupid fish. You are nothing but a fish, you fish!" The extent to which Tim failed to impress Cod with human superiority says more about neurosis as it also does about the fact fish know us to be bores (pun intended). Let's face it one scrapes the bottom of the barrel where pork is concerned. Cannily, even fish know how to cast a deprecating remark.

In some human circles to be addressed as a fat pig or even a simple pig for that matter is tantamount to a call to arms. Greed, covetousness, avarice, rapaciousness, gluttonous, and pleonexia, whatever. When I learn of humans whose noses are well in the trough the rage inside me crackles. I can not, can not stand it, even though I know I will be a hypocrite in pointing fingers. And here, my reader, lies the rub. I know full well my squeals will be flawed. It is just that an itch is one of those things, you know.. Of the scratching part - well, what can I say? Except. I am nothing but a stupid human being, a very stupid human being!